ADVERTISEMENT

A ‘Grand Theft Auto V’ Plane Vs 100+ Civilians, Who Ya Got? (VIDEO)

Gallery Icon

chris-littlechild - October 14, 2016

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that
supports HTML5 video

It’s funny to think that Grand Theft Auto V is over two years old now. That’s not nearly enough to get nostalgic about, natch, but the game’s sure come a damn long way since release. I feel a little like a proud Pa looking back at my little urchin’s first saxophone recital. Or, y’know, something. 

Like a lot of you Ego-gamers, I was there right from the start. I survived the great Grand Theft Auto Online Release Disaster of ’13 (man, that was a buggy shitstorm). Today, things are totally different, the game’s up to its scrote in spangly new content from regular free updates, and it’s still going strong in the popularity stakes.

Why? Most likely because it’s still the biggest name in big ol’ free roaming sandbox world games. We’ve seen The Witcher 3 and all sorts of others try to muscle into that territory, but the original crime ‘em up isn’t going anywhere. It’s the game that keeps on giving, and it’s still a part of pop culture. When something like Samsung’s exploding Galaxy Note 7 hits the news, snarky GTA modders will add it to the game as a new skin for the sticky bomb.

Grand Theft Auto Online is still a thing because it continues to ask the big questions. Questions like, how many pedestrians does a plane have to hit on the runway to stop it? Will a hundred of the poor bastards do?

 Above, YouTuber RZED proves that hell yeah it will. Damn. 100+ civilians 1, plane 0.  


Disclaimer: All rights reserved for writing and editorial content. No rights or credit claimed for any images featured on egotastic.com unless stated. If you own rights to any of the images because YOU ARE THE PHOTOGRAPHER and do not wish them to appear here, please contact us info(@)egotastic.com and they will be promptly removed. If you are a representative of the photographer, provide signed documentation in your query that you are acting on that individual's legal copyright holder status.


>